Tool Intelligence Profile

Qwen

Alibaba's Qwen LLM family: free Qwen Studio chat, Apache open weights (Qwen3.6), and Model Studio APIs with Turbo/Plus/Max pricing.

AI Writing freemium 0

Pricing

Contact Sales

freemium

Category

AI Writing

0 features tracked

Overview

Qwen (通义千问) is Alibaba Cloud’s large language model family and product suite. It spans open-weight models on Hugging Face and ModelScope, a free consumer chat app called Qwen Studio, and hosted APIs on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (DashScope) with OpenAI-compatible endpoints. The Qwen team ships dense and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models for text, vision, code, and agentic work, plus related tools such as Qwen Code and Qwen-Agent.

As of mid-2026 the lineup includes open generations Qwen3, Qwen3.5, and Qwen3.6 under Apache 2.0, alongside closed hosted flags such as Qwen3.7-Max and Qwen3.7-Plus available only via API. Alibaba reports the open family has surpassed 1 billion downloads and 200,000+ derivative models on Hugging Face. Primary jobs: chat and research in Qwen Studio, production inference via Model Studio, and self-hosted inference with vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama, or MLX.

Three ways to use Qwen: free Qwen Studio apps and web chat; pay-as-you-go Model Studio API (international Singapore and other regions); download open weights and run locally with zero per-token cost.

Key features

  • Open-weight models (Apache 2.0): Qwen3 dense sizes (0.6B–32B), MoE flags such as Qwen3-235B-A22B and Qwen3-30B-A3B, plus Qwen3.5 and Qwen3.6 series including Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (35B total / ~3B active) and Qwen3.6-27B dense. Weights on Hugging Face and ModelScope.
  • Qwen Studio: free AI assistant (web at chat.qwen.ai, plus iOS, Android, macOS, Windows) powered by the current Qwen series—chat, multimodal understanding, and consumer workflows without API billing.
  • Model Studio / DashScope API: official hosted access with OpenAI-compatible and Anthropic-compatible modes. Model IDs include qwen-turbo, qwen-plus, qwen-max, qwen3.6-plus, qwen3.6-flash, qwen3.7-plus, qwen3.7-max, and coder variants.
  • Long context: many hosted tiers advertise up to ~1M tokens (Plus/Max generations); open Qwen3.6 models document 262K native context, extendable via YaRN toward ~1M.
  • Multimodal: vision-language and omni-style models accept text, image, and (on newer tiers) video; separate Wan video generation models on Alibaba Cloud for T2V/I2V/edit.
  • Agentic coding & thinking mode: Qwen3.6 prioritizes repository-level coding, front-end workflows, and thinking-preservation across turns. Optional enable_thinking style reasoning on supported APIs (thinking tokens bill higher).
  • Qwen Code: open-source terminal coding agent optimized for Qwen models; works with Model Studio keys and local OpenAI-compatible servers.
  • Deployment stack: official guidance for Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp GGUF, MLX on Apple Silicon; Ollama library tags for qwen3.6 variants.
  • Language coverage: Qwen3.5/3.6 documentation cites support for 201 languages and dialects on recent open models.
  • Ecosystem volume: heavy traffic on OpenRouter and local-LLM communities; Alibaba also bundles third-party models (Kimi, GLM, MiniMax) under Coding Plan for coding tools.

Pricing

Qwen pricing splits into three layers: free consumer Studio, open weights (self-host), and usage-based Model Studio APIs. Activating Model Studio is free; you pay when you invoke models. New international users typically get a limited free quota in the Singapore region (trial tokens per model, time-limited). The old unlimited developer OAuth free tier for API/coding CLIs was discontinued in April 2026—do not plan production on “forever free API.”

Access path Cost model Notes (2026)
Qwen Studio (chat apps) Free Consumer product; not a substitute for production API SLAs
Open weights (HF / ModelScope) $0 / token Apache 2.0 for open Qwen3/3.5/3.6 variants; you pay GPU/hosting
Qwen-Turbo (API alias) ~$0.05 in / ~$0.20 out per 1M tokens Cheapest capable text tier; high throughput for simple tasks
Qwen-Plus (API alias) ~$0.40 in / ~$1.20 out per 1M Common production sweet spot; long context; thinking out higher
Qwen3.6-Plus / Flash (API) Roughly $0.25–$2.00 in / $1.50–$6.00 out per 1M Tiered by context length on some SKUs; multimodal Plus variants
Qwen3.7-Max (API-only) List about $2.50 in / $7.50 out per 1M Frontier closed flagship; promo discounts appear periodically
Coding Plan (Model Studio) Fixed monthly (Pro commonly cited ~$50 / ¥200) Request quotas for coding clients; Lite $10 tier ended for new users Mar–Apr 2026

Additional commercial levers on Alibaba Cloud include batch (~50% off many models), prompt caching (cache hits far cheaper than full input), AI Savings Plans (commitment discounts up to ~47% advertised), and an AI Token Plan subscription—community reports find pure pay-as-you-go often clearer than token-plan credit math. Always confirm live rates on Model Studio / Qwen Cloud model pages for your region; China (Beijing) and international endpoints differ in models, keys, and prices.

Billing gotchas: thinking-mode output can cost several times standard output; long-context brackets raise per-token rates; using the wrong base URL or non–Coding Plan key while subscribed still bills pay-as-you-go.

Limits & gotchas

  • Free API is gone: consumer Studio stays free; developer free OAuth quotas and generous free coding CLI tiers were removed in spring 2026. New accounts rely on limited Model Studio trial quota, then pay-as-you-go.
  • Regional complexity: API keys and base URLs are region-specific (Singapore, US Virginia, Beijing, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Frankfurt, etc.). Models and free quota availability differ—US Virginia often has no new-user free quota.
  • Compliance & data residency: China-origin provider; many enterprises still require extra legal/security review even when Alibaba documents no training on customer API data and encryption in transit.
  • Verbose completions: independent benchmarks note some Qwen models emit more output tokens per task than Claude/GPT peers, partially offsetting low per-token rates.
  • Caching uneven: community reports (r/Qwen_AI, coding-tool threads) that implicit cache hit rates can lag Western providers, inflating agentic coding bills under Coding Plan or Token Plan.
  • Closed vs open split: Max/Plus frontier SKUs may be API-only; open MoE/dense checkpoints lag or differ from the latest hosted flags—check the exact model ID.
  • Local hardware: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B runs well quantized on high-RAM Macs/GPUs (~15GB VRAM + system RAM for expert offload patterns), but full precision multi-GPU is still required for largest MoEs.
  • License history: early Qwen generations used custom Tongyi licenses; modern open Qwen3.x weights are Apache 2.0—verify the card for any residual proprietary SKU.

Community sentiment

On r/LocalLLaMA and related subreddits, Qwen3.6 (especially 35B-A3B MoE and 27B dense) is widely praised in 2026 as a turning point for local coding agents—users pair GGUF builds with OpenCode, llama.cpp expert offload, Ollama, and Claude Code–style workflows. Threads call 3.6 “the first local model that actually feels worth it” for real agentic coding, with notes that Q6 quants beat Q4 meaningfully for coding quality. MoE active-parameter efficiency (only ~3B active on 35B-A3B) is a recurring reason people pick Qwen over denser peers at similar VRAM.

Sentiment is more mixed on hosted pricing products: excitement about cheap Turbo/Plus rates and the Coding Plan’s multi-model access sits next to frustration after the free developer tier sunset, Lite plan removal (~$10), and Token Plan credit burn rates. Practitioners often recommend raw per-token Model Studio billing over opaque credit plans for cost control. Enterprise chatter still ranks Gemma/Mistral/GPT higher for regulated procurement, while startups and indie tool builders adopt Qwen aggressively for cost/performance.

Bottom line from community: open Qwen for local agents is a standout; hosted Qwen is excellent value if you watch thinking tokens, region setup, and subscription packaging.

Who should use it

  • Local / privacy-first builders who want Apache 2.0 weights, GGUF/MLX, and agentic coding without sending code to a US frontier API.
  • Cost-sensitive product teams running classification, extraction, batch pipelines, or multi-agent loops where Turbo/Plus economics dominate Claude Opus–class pricing.
  • Full-stack and agentic coders integrating OpenAI-compatible SDKs, Cursor/Cline/OpenCode/Claude Code with DashScope or self-hosted Qwen backends.
  • Multilingual product needs, especially Asia-focused or high language-count apps relying on Qwen’s 201-language training claims.
  • Not ideal as the only choice for highly regulated industries that ban China-origin vendors, or teams that need the absolute best closed reasoning at any price without self-host ops.

Alternatives

  • DeepSeek — another China-origin high-value API + open lineage; often compared for coding/math price-performance.
  • Mistral — European open-weight and API stack with strong enterprise procurement story in the EU.
  • OpenAI / ChatGPT — broader product surface and ecosystem defaults; higher token prices on frontier models.
  • Anthropic Claude — preferred for careful writing and many coding agents when budget allows.
  • Google Gemini — strong multimodal + long context in Google Cloud; different compliance profile.
  • Ollama — easiest local runner when you mainly want one-command Qwen3.6 tags, not Alibaba’s cloud.
  • Meta Llama — US open-weight baseline still common in enterprise self-host policies.

Verdict

Qwen in 2026 is one of the few stacks that is simultaneously a serious free consumer chat product, a high-volume open-weight ecosystem, and a full commercial Model Studio API. For developers, the open Qwen3.6 MoE/dense releases set the local coding bar; for production, Turbo/Plus-class pricing undercuts Western frontiers on many workloads if you engineer around thinking-mode cost, verbosity, and regional keys. Treat closed Max/Plus flags as optional upgrades, keep self-host as the real cost floor, and verify live Alibaba Cloud pricing for your region before locking a vendor decision. Honest fit: default open model for local agents and a primary cheap API for high-volume text—pair with Claude/OpenAI only where quality or compliance gaps still matter.

Head-to-Head

Compare Qwen Side-by-Side